Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 2661 - 2680 of 45,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by Danielle Wild
Rev. 131, 134 [2010] [collecting empirical data from numerous studies and concluding that “approximately 4500 people are wrongfully convicted every year in the United States due to eyewitness identification”].) [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Rev. 131, 134 [2010] [collecting empirical data from numerous studies and concluding that “approximately 4500 people are wrongfully convicted every year in the United States due to eyewitness identification”].) [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 4:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The 1974 Supreme Court decision O’Brien v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:23 pm
  As a result, there are plenty of people like Mr. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release  which meant that the claimant,  Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am by Eric Goldman
VOTERS: I ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE OUT ANYONE SO ILL-EQUIPPED FOR THE JOB OF REPRESENTING “THE PEOPLE. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Most people are familiar with the application of federal laws in the United States such as the Lanham Act and the Copyright Act in relation to parallel market issues. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J stated that “(i) The statement must be recognisable as comment, as distinct from an imputation of fact. [read post]