Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 2661 - 2680 of 6,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Lord Neuberger gave a short concurring judgment, endorsing Lord Sumption’s comments, but reiterating that it had never intended to be an absolute rule. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
In so doing, the court revived the Section 1981 and state law race discrimination claims of a fired shipping company broker, finding the evidence sufficient to dispute the company’s assertion that it fired the broker for falsifying records (Ortiz v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 6:03 am by John Jascob
The Commission reiterated its opinion that SEC ALJs have fewer powers than special trial judges, and instead are employees similar to the FDIC’s ALJ’s under Landry v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:51 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
Lord Mance reiterated that there is no duty of care owed between litigants and Lord Reed urged caution against “the interpretation of law reports from the 16th to the 18th centuries”, stating that “the court must not lose sight of the fact that it is deciding the law for the 21st century. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:38 am by Joy Waltemath
” In between those statements, he presented a slideshow reiterating the family theme that used the likenesses of union-eligible employees without their consent. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:00 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The permanent change standard is a very high hurdle, discussed and reiterated in the recent New Jersey Appellate Court’s decision of Grier v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:00 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The permanent change standard is a very high hurdle, discussed and reiterated in the recent New Jersey Appellate Court’s decision of Grier v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:00 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The permanent change standard is a very high hurdle, discussed and reiterated in the recent New Jersey Appellate Court’s decision of Grier v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
Smith, reiterating (and citing McDaniel for the proposition) that government may not “impose special disabilities on the basis of religious views or religious status. [read post]