Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 2661 - 2680 of 5,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Small p is good, and the standard rule of thumb is that a result with a p over 0.05 is not "statistically significant. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Supp. 2d 1345, 1367 (S.D.Fla.2011), aff’d, Chapman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
  In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 am by @travelblawg
Unfortunately for good taste, though, people should be allowed to buy shot glasses depicting those things. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 4:40 am by SHG
  But amongst good cops, this sort of conduct is intolerable to most; there are lines that cops should never cross. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
   This rule states: “Any party to a cause, and any person having a personal interest therein, with leave of the registrar on good cause shown, may at his office, examine and make copies of all documents in such cause’. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Ron Coleman
Charbucks case (decision here, posted by Marty; the real name of the case is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
In order for CCP to make good on its directive, it will have to do the hard ideological work of putting together its ideological corpus in a way that is accessible to cadres and non-CCP members. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am by Jeremy
Member States shall provide for authors, in respect of the original of their works or of copies thereof, the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any form of distribution to the public by sale or otherwise. 2. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm by Guest Blogger
The prison officials could offer no good reason for restricting the inmate’s beard. [read post]