Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 6,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:55 pm
Since the American Invents Act (AIA) in 2011, we now have a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) within the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:55 pm
Since the American Invents Act (AIA) in 2011, we now have a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) within the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
To obtain a patent, there is a (usually) lengthy and expensive application and prosecution process that occurs with the United State Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) granted the IPR petition filed by adidas AG (Adidas) and instituted inter partes review of claims 1–46 of the ’011 patent. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 2:53 pm
United States, 179 U.S. 77, 84 (1900). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:50 pm
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) recently affirmed the refusal to register the mark THCTEA, holding that it is “deceptively misdescriptive” when used in connection with tea-based beverages. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Both the Slog and blog Citizen Rain have pointed out that the coffee giant’s trademark inquiry has been terminated on the United States Patent and Trademark Office Web site. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:24 am
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016, I had the opportunity to go on the record with Michelle Lee, who is Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
Le 11 janvier 2016, le United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a déclaré une interférence entre les deux groupes, c. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:33 am
Additionally, although the statute is silent as to the proper claim construction standard to use in post grant proceedings, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has decided to apply the familiar standard used elsewhere throughout the Office, which is the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) rather than the so-called “Phillips standard” that is used in district court litigation and narrowly construes claims in an… [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
Another general rule often cited by Examining Attorneys at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) is that by merely adding or deleting a house mark or other term that is suggestive or descriptive of the goods or services, will not avoid a finding that the marks are confusingly similar. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:24 am
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
Continued invalidation of large swaths of discovery and innovation domestically will result in a shift of jobs and economic growth to areas where innovators can take advantage of broader patent protection.In the abstract for the paper Comment on "PATENT GRANT RATES AT THE UNITED STATES PATENTAND TRADEMARK OFFICE" [ 4 CHI. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:20 am
Trademark Compliance Office” and another from the “Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:06 am
Its new "Patent Trial and Appeal Board 2015 Report" provides lots of insight about last year's trials before the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board, i.e., the USPTO's in-house court system. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:37 am
” When advertisers widely began using this tactic, NFL Properties tried to register THE BIG GAME as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
