Search for: "White v. United States"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 7,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 5:04 pm
Angelone, 530 U.S. 156 (2000) sloppily and needlessly paraphrased that language in a case where the state court decision was entirely reasonable and there was no need to decide whether the "extension" gloss on "unreasonable application" was proper.Today in White v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:15 am
” Rather, as it says on page five of my passport, it is “U.S GOVERNMENT PROPERTY… It must be be surrendered upon demand made by an authorized representative of the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
The 1963 Sherbert v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDefendant Refusing to Cooperate With Counsel Competent; 'Precautionary' Exam, Testimony Noted United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
ArcSoft, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:17 pm
In Cleaning Up The Mess After United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:50 am
United States (Fiduciary Duty: Trust Funds) Tenorio v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:57 am
Tahsuda (Indian Child Welfare Act – Constitutionality)State of California v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
Davis appealed, and during that appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided the employer-friendly, anti-class action case, Dukes. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
The people of the United States have just won a great victory in the war to bring democracy and majority rule to Iraq. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
The case, White v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
In Utah v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
United States as permitting “Congress to inquire into and publicize corruption, maladministration or inefficiency in agencies of the Government. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
The ruling said that the United States must use Chinese prices to measure subsidies, even though the U.S. argued that such prices were distorted. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) has just ordered a U.S. import ban against older iPhones and iPads which were found to infringe a cellular standard-esential patent (SEP) asserted by Samsung, U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
In light of the five-year anniversary of the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
