Search for: "Best v. Best"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 41,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 1:57 pm
It's fascinating that, in 2023, to figure out who gets to take some salmon from a given river in Washington, we have to try to figure out as best we can the particular places that a very tiny group of Native American with no written history occasionally went to go fishing back in the early 1800s.Or, more accurately, what a particular federal judge thought a half-century ago about the report of a particular anthropologist (Dr. [read post]
1 May 2023, 10:43 am
A county court decision, but worthy of note here not just for the flimsy and inadequate evidence on which Lambeth initiated and pursued proceedings, but also for the way they continued to pursue proceedings for the best part of a year, despite breaching directions and despite the evidence of their own expert. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
Not according to a recent decision from the California Appellate Courts, Crane v R. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
Supremes are reviewing in the pending Moore v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
This assumption is premature at best, and incorrect at worst. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
Southey Doctor V. 165 A story strange I will you tell..Of a woman that danced upon the rope, And so did her husband too: With a dildo, dildo, dildo, With a dildo, dildo, dee.For the "object shaped like an erect penis," the oldest quote is from 1597, and the best quote is:a1631 J. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm
In so doing, the Bureau found that even after recalculating the coverage area proposed by each applicant, none of the applicants were eligible for points under “the best technical proposal” criterion because no applicant proposed to serve at least 10% more area and population than the next best proposal, as required to gain such a preference. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] N.J. Appellate Court Affirms Family Court Judge's Refusal to Order COVID Vaccination
29 Apr 2023, 10:59 am
From Scott v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
” Payton v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:54 pm
In Etheridge v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 3:31 pm
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:29 am
Another example can be found in the case of State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:10 am
For example, a recent Texas car accident case, Sibel Onasis Ferrer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:20 am
In Gamoff v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:55 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:51 am
The author’s view is that there are cogent and compelling reasons for adopting a broader view, that would promote certainty and consistency in a way that is not best served by the current approach. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most prominently, in Janus v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:56 pm
William v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:23 pm
Erin Murphy, counsel in Barnett v. [read post]
