Search for: "Case v. Case" Results 2681 - 2700 of 294,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 6:15 am by Gregory Forman
A final interesting case I located was Lynch v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 31.12 Public Duty Doctrine The Case: Ezell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
§ 19.3     Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine The Case:  Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:02 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Cases from the District of Columbia and four states — South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware and Kansas — were consolidated into Brown v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
The Court today granted review in a staggering 17 cases! [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:54 pm by admin
In a recent decision, the Federal Court of Appeal granted a stay of the Competition Tribunal’s May 29, 2012 decision in the contested CCS merger case Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:31 am
Coleman v Attridge Law (a Firm) and Another Case C-303/06 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The prohibition of direct discrimination against and harassment of disabled people in employment, provided for in the Community disability directive, was not limited to employees who were themselves disabled but extended to unequal treatment and harassment of a non-disabled employee for reasons connected with the disability of his child. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:41 am
Canterbury Hockey Club and Another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners Case C-253/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “Judgment October 16, 2008 Affiliation fees paid by sports clubs to an umbrella organisation in return for services supplied by the organisation were exempt from value-added tax if certain conditions were satisfied. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
The Court cited for this proposition an oft-cited 1961 Second Circuit case, Lummus Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court threw out the case, but the Court of Appeals reinstates it because plaintiff engaged in protected activity under the First Amendment.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
When browsing Case C‑97/12 P, Louis Vuitton Malletier v OHIM, a 15 May ruling of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on registrability of an illustration of a lock for goods which either did or didn't have locks, he noticed that some of the cases cited in the CJEU's judgment had odd-looking citations for reference purposes. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
It discusses the leading case of Sandstrom v Montana and its holding that a presumption cannot be mandatory in a criminal case. [read post]