Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 2681 - 2700 of 16,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2016, 1:43 am
Should the platform not comply with the latter, AGCM might issue a fine which can reach 25% of the income originating from the period of activity carried out lacking registration. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 4:04 am
According to O'Brien, if Jane Doe 2 and 3 hadn't come forward, he would have "kept this up. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Rule #2: If the customs brokerage services relate to an objection, appeal, re-determination, re-appraisal, review, refund, abatement, remission or drawback, or in relation to a request for any of the foregoing (called herein "post-importation customs brokerage services"), Rule #1 does not apply. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by News Desk
Furthermore, the study does not support the shelf-life of the product which is defined as 28 days. 2. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
On June 25, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam, an asylum-seeker, does not have a constitutional right to habeas corpus review in federal court of his claims that the government violated his constitutional, statutory and regulatory rights in issuing an order for his expedited removal. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm by Bill Marler
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
As it is written in 2 Pet. 3:9 (with my emphasis added) --The Lord is not slow concerning his promise, as some regard slowness, but is being patient toward you, because he does not wish for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.Deo sit gloria. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 12:12 am by Daniel Richardson
  Probable cause does not lend itself to inflexible, mechanistic rules. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Jason Healey
Part 2 of this series will be published in the coming days. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:47 pm
Without some explanation as to what the declaration does or does not show, Appellants do not persuade us that the declaration demonstrates diligence over the period from December 20, 2001 through June 25, 2002. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:21 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The MOPAC’s appeal on the issue of liability was therefore dismissed. (2) Does liability under the Act extend to consequential losses? [read post]