Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 41,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 8:41 pm
” Id. at *10 (text added). [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:38 am
That approach continues to build on both the bedrock principles under which our current system has operated and the over 30 years of New Jersey precedent interpreting the Canons.Thus, as does the ABA Model Code, the Committee's proposal contains Canons that express general principles of conduct followed by rules that prescribe specific standards of conduct.As to the amendments proposed within this rulemaking, most of those are technical in nature, either eliminating cross-references to… [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:58 am
The IRS claimed that it was within the 10-year statute because the limitation period was suspended for 241 days during the pendency of the collections due process hearing, as directed by Code §6330(e)(1). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
After recalling why droit d'auteur traditions have been traditionally wary of fair use, he explained why things have somehow changed: (1) civil law has moved to more open norms; (2) authors right systems have been moving away from natural law arguments to justify copyright protection; (3) fair use is not unpredictable [but it is not so widespread either: see map]; (4) fair use does not conflict with the Berne three-step test. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:32 am
Not quite 1 in 5 high-risk patients with heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) died on conference days, but 1 in 4 died on days when there was no meeting. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:10 pm
The reason is that filing it late doesn't stop the 10 year clock but does give you an appeal "equivalent" hearing and the IRS as an internal policy will usually stop collections anyway. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:22 pm
The forecast shows 169,890 deaths in the US by October 1, with a possible range between 133,201 and 290,222. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
As Tim Cleary [the Hearing Officer in that opposition] said: "Notwithstanding the fact that the Opponent did not formally abandon the other grounds of opposition, namely those under Sections 6(1), 8(1)(b), 8(3)(b), 8(4)(a), 10(1), 10(3), 10(4)(b), 37(2) and 42(2) of the Act, I am satisfied that there is no need for me to give them any serious consideration [that's NINE grounds of opposition, raised for no good reason]. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:56 pm
The Act maintains seven (7) income tax brackets but lowers the income tax rates to 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37% from 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35% and 39.6%. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am
Indeed, claim 1 does not comprise any technical feature characterizing the "reference voltage generation circuit" other than by the fact that it is located within the sensor holder and by the fact that it supplies a "reference voltage" to a sensor. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am
In this decision the Board of Appeal is annoyed about the fact that a Rule 140 Correction of a decision of the Examining Division (signed by the whole division) and a Rule 139 Correction of an obvious error (signed only by the primary examiner in the opposition period, i.e. after grant; G 1/10 stopping this process was not yet issued) are not in the public part of the file.The Board sees the R.139 correction as not valid since no formally correct decision is taken; it would require… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:04 pm
Read Entire Article: [cms.firehouse.com] The crimes charged are as follows: 1. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:02 am
Does a spouse getting married for revenge on an ex-boyfriend, saying that she never loved her husband, qualify as grounds for an annulment? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
Question #10 – H-1B Nonimmigrant Work Visa When does my time on my H-1B visa start? [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #10 It depends. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
Id. at *10 (citation omitted)." [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Oakes, 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC), [1986] 1 SCR 103 1. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:47 am
Tort Act of 1972 10. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Also, there is no Article 2a in the California UCC, it’s Division 10. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:00 am
For injuries occurring after 10/1/95 temporary total disability benefits shall cease if the employer refuses an offer of work that is consistent with the rehabilitation plan. [read post]
