Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 4,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
” Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
This arrangement will allow music fans to enjoy our music on Pandora while protecting our songwriters and composers".The Conan Doyle Estate Ltd., owned and run by the family of writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, has appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals from the lower court decision in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate Ltd. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:55 am
Supreme Court granted a discharged public employee’s petition for certiorari in a case that may adjust the legal landscape surrounding First Amendment retaliation claims (Lane v Franks, Dkt No 13-483). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:39 am
Franks, hailing from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
— I’ll be frank. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
The Court rewrote the question in the state case — Riley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
What’s not ramping up: romance in the home of the new president of Alabama State University. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:57 pm
111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
Evans to United State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Franks, 13-483. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:49 am
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act required these advisors to register with the SEC like other market intermediaries. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 12:07 pm
., v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
” “Health Hazard Progress Notes: Compensation Advance Made in New York State,” 16(5) Asbestos Worker 13 (May 1966). [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
More on detention: Updating us on Abdullah v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
There is a likelihood of confusion between the Marks BETPACK and BETDAQ and the registration of a confusingly similar mark is contrary to the provisions of Community Law prohibiting the registration of the Trade Mark in the State, particularly Council Regulations regarding the registration of trade marks. [read post]
