Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD" Results 2681 - 2700 of 5,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Stewart Baker
 We’ve invited Becky Richards, NSA’s privacy and civil liberties watchdog, on the program to talk about it, so I’m using this post to lobby her to become a guest soon: Come on in, Becky, it’s a new day at the NSA! [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:46 pm
The last choice, of course, means that WBL#2 cannot consent any more than a little child can. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:31 am by Cody Poplin
Our phones and computers have become reflections of our personalities, our interests, and our identities. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:56 pm
  We’ve invited Becky Richards, NSA’s privacy and civil liberties watchdog, on the program to talk about it, so I’m using this post to lobby her to become a guest soon:   Come on in, Becky, it’s a new day at the NSA! [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:04 pm by Jeff Redding
  This time, however, I’m afraid it’s worse:  the blind have guns and war debris. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
I showed interest in their lives but they never knew about mine. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:40 pm
I’m not sure what sort of legally relevant information might be contained in the subpoenaed sermons. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
The legal profession has duties to the court, to the Crown and to the defence of their client’s rights and interests. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first surrogacy case arose in New Jersey, in which courts were asked to rule on the parentage of “Baby M,” a child conceived in traditional surrogacy pursuant to a written agreement. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Likewise, for the rape victim name case, the authors write, “[k]eeping [the identity of a victim of sexual assault] private is more of a liberal interest, so the speech is coded as conservative”; I’m not sure whether that’s an accurate summary of political views now, or in 1989, but in any event it focuses on the ideology behind the law, not on the ideology of the speaker. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Support for this hypothesis comes from Akiva M. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Splitting those apart is the point of the paper.Poor theory of distinctiveness + incredibly strong rights = trademark proliferation, land grab for expressive components of society b/c it’s in their interests to do so. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:33 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
  Brandon’s wife, Deanna, was Dianne’s only child, and the sole beneficiary of her estate. [read post]