Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 2681 - 2700
of 13,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
And if you find that too much for you, don't be surprised that you're both sentenced to death and that the California Supreme Court decides to affirm. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 10:39 am
via www.wsj.com I'm probably among the last people you would ask for advice about this, but what I find works well is just to ask questions -- not too inflammatory ones (e.g. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
For certain industries requiring (in many cases) huge capital investment before profits can be made (e.g., technology, life sciences), you’re more likely to need this kind of institutional investment. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
What if the eventual GOP nominee has a massive scandal (e.g. [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:40 am
If you're driving along the road and you see something like a police car with its lights on at the shoulder of the road, you should move over a lane if you can. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Healthy people don't usually develop bedsores since we're constantly adjusting posture and position, shifting the 'pressure' of body weight around. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:28 am
"Now comes news that the museum will not re-hang the work, citing safety concerns. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 6:54 am
I'm less concerned with the AMA's licensing of physician info (they're on the receiving end of other info-sharing deals, e.g., Sermo) than with the availability of patient data, prescription and otherwise, and the so-called secondary use of this health data -- which really ought to be better-protected than it is. -- David Harlow [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 2:54 pm
See, e.g., PrawfsBlawg; Obscure Store; WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:37 pm
E.g.: Ezra do they actually pay you for this drivel or do you get supplemental pay from Acorn or the SEIU? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:09 am
Interestingly, the Information Law Group notes: "Unlike some bills that limit jurisdiction to only those entities regulated by the FTC (e.g. the DATA Act), the scope of entities regulated by the Act is broad and goes to the limits of Federal jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
See, e.g., FTC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:51 pm
” We've thought of appropriate illustrations for some on that list – e.g., a ball stadium for “public purpose, ” a limited-access highway under construction for “damages,” but the creative readers of this blog may have others. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:48 am
Most notably, the final rule increases the threshold of swap activity that would bring a financial end user (e.g., hedge fund) within the rule’s scope from $3 billion to $8 billion. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:30 am
Their appeal failed and the case reminds us of how to approach these cases: (a) where the lease provides for a specific percentage, the LVT cannot go behind that apportionment (see Schilling v Canary Riverside Development Pte Ltd LRX/26/2005); (b) if, however, the lease provides for a discretion (whether on initial proportions or on re-assessment), the LVT has power to review that discretion (c) that jurisdiction derives not from s.19, LTA 1985, as it is not an issue of the reasonableness… [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 11:51 pm
But as a lawyer blogging on a niche topic for which you have first hand expertise, you're a pretty credible source. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 7:42 pm
., privacy protections aren't balanced against the interests of copyright holders - they're used as a pretext to advance the interests of copyright holders when it isn't politically expedient to advance the interests of copyright holders directly (see, e.g., here. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
For example, chatbots and virtual assistants (e.g., Alexa, Siri) are considered artificial narrow intelligence since they’re unable to incorporate human behaviors or interpret emotions, reactions, or tones. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:32 am
What role should be played by exiting laws, e.g., hate crime statutes? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:03 am
And in the unfortunate event that you’re in the 1% that have a case with lots and lots of plaintiffs and/or realllllllly horrible facts, expect to pay more than $1 million. [read post]
