Search for: "MARK D. LINK" Results 2681 - 2700 of 4,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am by William Carleton
For convenience, here are links to complete copies in pdf and html. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:12 am by Steve Hall
" Earlier coverage of the Connecticut repeal legislation begins at the link. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
 If you'd like to attend such a course (or if you'd like to volunteer to run it!) [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:12 am by Steve Hall
Earlier coverage of the Connecticut repeal legislation begins at the link. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:57 am
  Matt’s presentation was good, but I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t interested in what Niki had to share. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
There’s no doubt that intermediaries like Google make infringement on the internet possible, for without the intermediaries there’d be no internet to infringe on in the first place. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.April 10, 2012 - 10 AM: Virgin Enterprises Limited v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:21 am by John L. Welch
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on this Section 2(d) Refusal of READYSHIP over SHIPREADYTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability on this Section 2(d) Design Mark RefusalWYHO? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:38 am by Andrew Trask
Type in the new one, or mark it on a paper copy and hand it to your admin.) [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
 Thirdly, as regards the conceptual comparison, the Court agreed (at [56]) with the Board that neither trade mark was conceptually comparable because neither had a meaning which linked it to a specific concept. 3. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:04 am by Jared Correia
For example, at the YouTube homepage, you’ll see a list of videos that your social contacts (Google+ connections) have +1’d, or marked with their vague stamp of approval. [read post]