Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2014, 10:43 am
” To the contrary: In its briefto the Court (p.36) it represented that “an injunction pending appeal would deprive hundreds of employees and students and their dependents of coverage for these important services. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 8:52 am
” Yet the matter is not quite as simple as that. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:46 pm
” The court concluded that there are only two bases of liability under §43(a)(1), and if you choose (B) it must be false advertising, as opposed to (A)’s false association. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
Carter Snead is the William P. and Hazel B. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Hennes 17,857 21,428 0 0 39,285 Franz B. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
Driverless cars are on the road now – Google’s fleet has logged about 700,000 miles of autonomous driving – and the California DMV will be issuing regulations in a matter of weeks allowing self-driving cars to be sold to the public, possibly setting the regulatory pattern for the rest of the country (video). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:41 pm
Driverless cars are on the road now – Google’s fleet has logged about 700,000 miles of autonomous driving – and the California DMV will be issuing regulations in a matter of weeks allowing self-driving cars to be sold to the public, possibly setting the regulatory pattern for the rest of the country (video). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:04 am
Amos dismissed the consumer protection claim as a matter of law, because under New York’s learned intermediary rule, claimed deficiencies in information directed solely to physicians isn’t “consumer oriented” so as to fall within a consumer protection statute:[P]laintiff alleges that the defendants deceived consumers by concealing information about the dangers of taking [a prescription drug]. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
In Paragraph 62 (p.119) the court stated:- “It is true that Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, but this is not conclusive of the matter … [.] the court is entitled to have regard to [the decision making] process to determine whether it has been conducted in a manner that, in all the circumstances, is fair and affords due respect to the interests protected by Article 8. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Nothing in Attachment B, however, explicitly requests that Apple give the government any e-mails. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
But of course figuring out the true justification can be a highly contested matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
” Elizabeth Chambliss & David B. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
Erica P. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
Brief for United States in No. 13–212, p. 26. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:06 pm
Erica P. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
P v Q v R ~P_____ ∴ Q v R ~Q_____ ∴ R Hence, the term, “iterative disjunctive syllogism. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
” Briefly: Jeremy P. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
Plaintiffs and Appellants failed to exhaust administrative remedies (as required by Government Code § 65009(b)(1)) on their argument that County’s project approval was inconsistent with the General Plan’s traffic level of service (LOS) policies for roadways and intersections operating at worse-than-acceptable LOS. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
See also §1611(a), (b)(1), (b)(2). [read post]
