Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 4,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Finally, there is a lengthy list of particular models that fall within the scope of the statute, notably all “AK” weapons (modeled after the Russian AK-47) and all “AR” weapons (those modeled after the AR-15). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:23 am
Now comes MPAO v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
Will it be a state in which one ethnicity dominates another—the prospect that many people see in the recent passage by the Knesset of a new Basic Law on Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:27 am
It means principally that Hong Kong must be subject to national objectives, national priorities, and be faithful to core national principles that further the integrity of the state, and its political-economic model. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
USPS v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:32 am
Old-timers will have flashbacks of controversial Rule 19c-4 - which was adopted in 1988 to limit the ability of companies to deviate from "one share, one vote" - and which was struck down in 1990 by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:40 am
Facts At Issue In Seibert v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:54 am
But then it goes on to cite at length Network Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm
This happened in NAACP v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
.), and Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth V. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
On reviewing the decision of the Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Among the displays was a Lego model train exhibit. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
Far too much of our research, our brain modeling is done based on what we learned about young jocks. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
Wednesday's New Jersey Supreme Court opinion, State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Limiting the power to authorize DNA collection to judges ensures that an adequate detachment is maintained between the investigating body and the appraiser of reasonable suspicion on which DNA collection is predicated.RetentionOnce DNA has been collected pre-trial, divergence is also evident in terms both of the period and of the form of retention.Indefinite retention of DNA was once permitted in England and Wales, but was impugned in S. and Marper v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:10 pm
What I find dismaying is not only the possibility that Kagan will choose to replicate role models that she herself correctly exposed as deeply flawed. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:05 am
The purpose of virtual worlds is to bring people together. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
Nearly half a century has passed since the Supreme Court’s decision in Gideon v. [read post]
