Search for: "STATE v. GREEN"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 6,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
The Supreme Court has just handed down its decision in 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
United States 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
In the case of Gentry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Research Institute, Inc. v Green, 2015 NY Slip Op 06399, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn its review of a Supreme Court ruling in a real property action in which one of the parties sought summary judgment to enforce a “settlement agreement,” the Appellate Division set out a number of guidelines to could lead to effecting a binding settlement agreement. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:16 am
In the most important patent case this year, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:45 am
Norfolk Southern Corp., 238 F.R.D. 555, 558 (E.D.N.C. 2006); Greene v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:06 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
The Second Circuit gives it back (but agrees that the damages were too high).The case is Green v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
In Texas Rice Land Partners, LTD v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:30 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Green v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm
Green Dev. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
Scotland Scottish Green Party MSP Andy Wightman has been sued for defamation with £750,000 damages sought, and has stated on his blog that he will fight the case “to the utmost. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) James Drain v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
State Comp. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:46 am
Anthony Kennedy, published in the Green Bag. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
He argued that compelling him to disclose his text messages would violate the state and federal constitutions and was prohibited by state and federal statutes. . . . [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Andrew Green KC, who represents the Mirror, suggested that although the company’s journalists hacked the voicemails of numerous celebrities during the 2000s, there was no evidence that the Duke of Sussex was also target. [read post]
