Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
First, simply because the term is also invoked in another type of case does not preclude its application here. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am
Instead, the court said, the district court’s judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s March 21, 2019 opinion (which the appellate court attached to its August 21 order). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Aug. 23, 2019) (reversing district court’s judgment of dismissal under the Texas Citizen Participation Act and remanding for further proceedings under the federal rules)(Opinion by Edith Jones)Klocke v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
District Court for the District of Columbia considered—and rejected—President George W. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Plaintiff’s first argument relied in part on Rominger v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:03 am
District Court in New Jersey in Bonner v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:32 pm
The bench makes the calls, notes the Ninth: let the players play the game.United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:56 am
Instead, in conclusory fashion, the district court stated that nationwide relief is warranted simply because district courts have the authority to impose such relief in some cases and because such relief has been applied in the immigration context. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
In Jones, the court stated: Neither Mr. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
In CELGENE CORPORATION v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
The first factor was therefore satisfied. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Com’rs of Brevard Cnty. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
As a majority of the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm
District Court: Which I credit. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:44 pm
State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]
