Search for: "State v. Townes"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 5,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
See Aguilar v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
” Monasky v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCompleteness Doctrine Referenced in Holding Agent's Notes Admitted to Avoid Misleading Jury; New Trial Denied United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
If it did, cities and towns could quickly crack down on messages they don’t like. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:56 am
When the President comes to town, it's protest time. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 2:02 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 3:10 am
DUHAMELL, Plaintiff v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 10:34 pm
” In her Dissent, Warner stated that it “reveals the tenacious grip that the male image has in the legal profession to the detriment of women who have joined the profession in droves since I began practicing 48 years ago. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:27 pm
We are a national state with our own laws. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:41 am
See, e.g., Good News Club v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 4:51 am
Native Village of Kialina v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:34 am
The AG’s office had concluded “that an outright ban on the possession of electronic arms within the state … would likely not pass constitutional muster” in light of Caetano v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
In Town of Apex v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:23 am
That case is titled: Safety Syringes, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
Town of Richmond, 570 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip and Smithtown v New York State Div. of Human Rights Appeal Board, 35 NY2d 371, 380, motion to reargue denied, 36 NY2d 807, it was held that an aggrieved individual must file a timely notice of claim "as to the former but not as to the latter. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:00 am
Applying the Pell Doctrine in a disciplinary actionSullivan v County of Rockland, 2017 NY Slip Op 03519, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDisciplinary penalties imposed on public employees in New York State must meet the test set out in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
