Search for: "U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 7,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 8:21 am
They alleged that the county violated their Due Process rights by removing their names from a “rehire list” maintained by the New Jersey Civil Service Commission (CSC). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Civil rights groups who had sued the government over its addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census had asked Hazel to reconsider his ruling on whether the government was guilty of conspiracy and intent to discriminate after new evidence in the case emerged in May. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:50 pm
In two important early cases over Internet speech, courts allowed civil defamation claims against Prodigy but not against Compuserve. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
He strikes the right balance: the focus is on Olmsted's work, but with enough details of his personal and emotional life to give context and resonance to the story. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:43 pm
With few exceptions, these cases involve the protected statuses as set forth in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:59 pm
The Civil Service Commission rejected the challenge. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Or a universal right for clients to have their secrets kept? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
These efforts were initiated by major tech corporations in cooperation with states, think tanks and civil society organizations. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:43 am
Today the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
This suit was filed by the aggrieved customer after litigation over the same issue between Phillips and the Colorado Civil Rights Commission was dropped. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Shuttlesworth v City of Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969), the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
This Part 3 includes the official response of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:37 am
A new ruling from the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
In this column, I’ll explain the reasoning of the Court’s opinion and, more importantly, why a seemingly small technical question might make a real difference in protecting employees from discrimination in the workplace.Litigating Claims Under Title VIITitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is at the heart of federal anti-discrimination law. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 10:18 am
Most significantly, AB 25 proceeded forward, clarifying that the definition of a consumer does not include employees, and SB 561 died, ending (for now) the notion of an expanded private right of action. [read post]
