Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
It was seen as a direct challenge to the 2012 Supreme Court decision that struck down a similar law in the case of Arizona vs. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in argued cases: The Court today issued rulings in six argued cases. 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that, “[s]aying the opioid crisis requires bold measures, the state of Arizona filed an audacious lawsuit in the Supreme Court on Wednesday asking the justices to order members of the Sackler family, which owns Purdue Pharma, to return what the state said were billions of dollars looted from the company. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, which struck down an Arizona law, known as Proposition 200, requiring residents to prove citizenship when they register to vote. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:41 am
The project was made possible by the Arizona Supreme Court, McCune Television, National Bank of Arizona and the Foundation. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:00 pm
The Maine Supreme Court reversed a ruling from a judge that would have given him access to practice law in the state. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:51 pm
It’s mid-June, which means that things are starting to heat up in the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Connecticut 19-1010Issue: Whether, contrary to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b), the Supreme Court’s decisions and the decisions of five U.S. courts of appeals, a district court may compel a party that has not engaged in discovery-related misconduct to produce documents that are neither relevant nor responsive. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Requirements to run: You must be an active member in good standing with the State Bar of Arizona who has been admitted to practice law before the Arizona Supreme Court for not less than five years; You must submit a nominating petition, a brief biographical sketch or candidate’s statement, a discipline disclosure statement, and a photograph; Your nominating petition and materials must be received no later than 5 p.m., Monday, March 5, 2012, at either of the… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm
" As the Supreme Court prepares to hear argument on the constitutionality of S.B. 1070 on April 25, this decision is a timely reminder that, while there are many technical legal steps along the way, courts can and should focus on what everyone knows is really at stake here: whether states and cities will be allowed to legislate discrimination, and whether they will be allowed to enact their own local immigration laws and policies. [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:00 am
Arizona Supreme Court vacated part of the lower court opinion in Barron v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:00 am
Arizona Supreme Court vacated part of the lower court opinion in Barron v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 10:52 am
Scott Timmer of the Arizona Supreme Court, who chaired the Arizona Supreme Court’s Task Force on the Delivery of Legal Services, which recommended rules ultimately adopted by the court that created a new tier of legal services provider and eliminated the ban on non-lawyer ownership. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Former Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor “This special dinner meeting will bring together these two legal powerhouses to discuss U.S., European, and international law issues. [read post]
2 May 2008, 5:51 pm
I've spent the last year as a visitor from nowhere at Arizona State's law school, teaching administrative law, civil procedure, and a seminar on the Supreme Court and politics, and I recently received an offer for a tenure track position (hooray). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
Supreme Court in argued cases: You can access the Order List at this link. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 4:01 pm
Supreme Court expert. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
Why, the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:36 pm
" Accordingly the court held that while "restricting the dismissal of negligence actions for lack of duty may be thought desirable as more protective of a litigant's jury-trial right, such a fundamental change in the common law requires an evaluation of competing public policies that is more appropriately addressed to the Arizona Supreme Court" and so declined a request to adopt the Third Restatement. [read post]
