Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
The federal government lawyer, Deputy Solicitor General Neal K. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(Sabbah v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
Superior Court (Transamerica Ins. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
The April 5, 2010 Court of Appeals opinion in Gorecki v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
BC347671) APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm
” The Arizona Court followed the lead of California in Howard v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
Blancato, who was the plaintiffs' attorney, observed that the 17% annual interest rate on the loans might be usurious under General Obligations Law § 5-501 and Banking Law § 14-a, which generally fix the maximum annual interest rate which may be charged for these types of transactions at 16%. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
Superiority When a statute allows a prevailing plaintiff to recover attorney's fees and costs, a class action is generally not a superior method for litigating a case. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm
Superior Court (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 864, 877) The problem is compounded by the fact that different agencies can come to different conclusions. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
Attorney General) to petition for a protective order. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court in a single case: Reisch v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Writ of prohibition not available to bar an executive action such as conducting an investigationMatter of Doe v Cuomo, 2010 NY Slip Op 02143, Decided on March 16, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department“John Doe” initiated a CPLR Article 78 action seeking a writ of prohibition* to bar NYS Attorney General Andrew M. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm
.'"In the absence of any agreed upon forum selection between the parties, Rule 1006 governs and generally provides that proper venue is where the accident occurred or where a defendant resides or regularly conducts business.In the case of Sehl v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
Whether the Superior Court erred in holding the attorney-client privilege applies only to confidential communications from the client to the attorney, pursuant to Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am
The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:08 am
I’m sure there’s a long history but that’s what the Court said that applies to guardianships generally. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
Kostro, Esq., an attorney/lawyer/mediator in Linden, Union County, New Jersey. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:41 pm
Superior Court upheld the Board's decision [Jackson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
Perry v. [read post]
