Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 11,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
State Bar of California should be overruled and “integrated bar” arrangements like Wisconsin’s invalidated under the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
The embrace of bad studies and invalid inferences is not the exclusive province of the plaintiffs’ bar. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
California – California Newspaper Asked for Sutter County Concealed Gun Permits. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected a challenge brought by a coalition of states to the proposed merger between telecom companies T-Mobile and Sprint. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected a challenge brought by a coalition of states to the proposed merger between telecom companies T-Mobile and Sprint. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:38 am
We should support the Court as it considers the future of the bar exam. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of California, arguing that he was not given a “meaningful right to apply for asylum,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:51 am
In September 2019, the State of California enacted AB 5, which codifies the state’s Supreme Court holding in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:45 am
The employer-side bar has succeeded in the United States Supreme Court to sustain such provisions. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:08 am
California, ex rel. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm
California, ex rel. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm
They (perhaps surprisingly), let the claims continue to go forward (California v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:28 pm
In October, the federal government asked the Supreme Court to take the California "sanctuary state" case, which raises much the same issue as the New Jersey case. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:50 pm
The employer-side bar has succeeded in the United States Supreme Court to sustain such provisions. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:47 am
Friends, coworkers, aunts, uncles, and grandparents are legally barred from filing these suits, and any lawsuit filed by such persons will be dismissed. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
Becerra et al., No. 2:19-cv-02456, a group of plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Eastern District of California asking the court to declare California’s AB 51 preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Pursuant to House Committee Rule 15(e)––a seldom-used rule from the early 2000s––the House barred agency counsel from impeachment-inquiry depositions but did permit witnesses to be accompanied by private counsel. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 2:05 pm
” As the court stated, that section does not require that the material actually be objectionable; rather, it affords protection for blocking material that the provider or user considers to be “objectionable. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
There may be an anticommons argument in a hackathon as well.Gebru: it’s a low bar: the consideration could be pizza. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:30 am
When Seila Law declined to respond fully to the CFPB’s request for information and documents, the agency went to federal court in California to enforce the request. [read post]
