Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 2701 - 2720 of 16,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The [opponent] added that the terms “flow” and “spread” and “mortar” and “concrete”, respectively, were not synonyms and that D12 does not describe 12 blows, as in the patent, but 25 drops.The Board cannot follow these arguments because the opposed patent describes that the ultra high performance concretes “conventionally have a spread value of at least 150 mm, […] the spread value being measured by the shock table… [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am by Eric Goldman
Aug. 25, 2022) * * * Cases referencing thumbs-up emojis: 2 Bubbles LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Texas Are Overstated (Updated)–2/25/21 BREAKING: SCOTUS Holds 7-2 Texas Lacks Standing to Press Obamacare Claim (Updated)—6/17/21 What the Supreme Court Got Right (and Justice Alito Got Wrong) in the Texas ACA Decision—6/17/21 [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:29 pm
Case reference : Bundespatentgericht, 25 W (pat) 182/09, delivered on 4 February 2011.The court's press release can be found here.The decision can already be retrieved in its entirety (German, PDF) by clicking here. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:02 am by Nick Robinson
This should immediately strike one as odd because one does not usually think of Kerala or Pondicherry as the most crime-ridden parts of India. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
REASON The product does not meet specifications, as it has a low pH and contains undeclared ingredients. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:03 am by Kyle Hulehan
Italy Interest deductions limited to 30% of EBITDA Japan Corporation deductible net interest expense is limited to 20% of EBITDA, adjusted to exclude extraordinary income or loss Exemptions apply for those with net interest expenses of less than ¥20 million Carryforwards allowed for up to seven years Latvia Interest deductions limited to 30% of EBITDA for deduction exceeding €3 million (certain financial institutions exempt) 4:1 debt-to-equity ratio applies for deduction up to €3… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:48 am by Brian D. Zuccaro, Esq.
And (2) Does the applicant possess appropriate credentials to qualify for the TN occupational category. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:31 am by Florian Mueller
In other words, the fact that this dispute is just about money and not about excluding a competitor is simply attributable to Nokia's FRAND obligation and does not, in and of itself, call into question its entitlement to injunctive relief. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:37 pm by Unknown
  It does not make a distinction between types of businesses, such as research intensive industries. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
This evidence was (i) late filed (Article 12(2) RPBA), but also (ii) insufficient to prove the transfer. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 2(“The United States Patent and Trademark Office. . . shall be responsible for the granting and issuing ofpatents. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
Earlier today, the General Court (GC) issued a keenly-awaited ruling (T‑307/17), in which it upheld the earlier decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (R 1515/2016-2), and found this three-stripe EU trade mark (EUTM) owned by adidas:invalid. [read post]