Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
Censors should be independent, not just of the state, but of other interest groups, such as the industry itself, and yes, the child protection sector. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
by Dennis Crouch Sabatino Bianco, M.D. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
In Buck v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
In 2007, Mr Justice Pumfrey tried to do away with disclosure on obviousness in Nichia v Argos. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
One could not confidently say the same of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:50 am
The Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion on "Obamacare" (aka Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act): National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am
Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:43 pm
For an early articulation that seems to echo this view, see the summary of the trial judge's instructions in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:48 am
Drivers, the Supreme Court held in Wooley v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
For starters, there is no doubt, based on a reading of Securicor and the rich jurisprudence of the English courts on the issue of contractual interpretation (the latest addition to which is Campbell v Daejan Properties), that when interpreting a contract the intention of the parties reign supreme, and blanket rules are to be avoided. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
While the English v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:07 am
Case reference: Duncombe & Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No. 2) Tagged: Jurisdiction [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
English on this email so she will know that the blue folder will be kept in [our daughter's] backpack. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
