Search for: "Lee v. State "
Results 2701 - 2720
of 5,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 9:58 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
The court disagreed with this narrow interpretation, citing the Sixth Circuit opinion in Lee v City of Columbus for the proposition that Section 12112(d)’s use of the phrase “confidential” is meant to be interpreted in the light of preventing employers from discriminating on the basis of information gleaned from job-related medical examinations. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
V. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
Brandon Lee Hoffman, 2013-0688. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
The PTO backlog of unexamined patent applications is less than 620,000 which is down from more than 750,000 in 2009 (a 17.3 percent decrease)… On a cynical note, I will observe that reducing the backlog will become much easier for the USPTO, as will meeting pendency goals, based upon the United States Supreme Court’s breathtaking decision in Alice v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
Lee Library at Brigham Young University. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:49 pm
Lee v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
Lee-Hy Paving, 437 F.Supp. 994 and Torres v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Lee were employees of Dr. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
Circuit Court released a few notable opinions this week: on Monday, it announced its ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Five Justices in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:18 am
Now, in Lee v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:09 pm
Lee appeals. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
She systematically mapped the scope of state-based and individual-based protections against espionage, surveillance and data collection (relying in particular on the U.N. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:24 pm
Dixon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
