Search for: "Lilly"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 3,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| BEAUTY & THE BAY not an infringement of BEAUTY BAY, says High Court | US copyright registration for the Tommy Hilfiger Flag denied due to insufficient originality | The reemergence of issues surrounding copyright and the Australian Aboriginal Flag… | Gigi Hadid, Smile for the Copyright | Eli Lilly v Fresenius Kabi: a decision far from equivalent to what has been decided before | Re-establishment: An isolated error in a well-functioning system may not be equivalent to all due… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:47 pm
See Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:00 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 998 F.2d 931, 937 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 2015 U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:54 am
Lilly v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:32 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal. 3d 1103 (1988), the court declined to apply the American Pipe rule to a personal-injury mass-tort action case arising from alleged product defects and negligence relating to a prescription drug. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
Image Credits: In NYCPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 204 [Week ending 28 Oct] Court of Appeal reaffirms UK as SEP litigation hotspot in upholding Birss J in Unwired Planet | Much Ado About FRAND: What you need to know about today's Court of Appeal Unwired Planet decision | AIPPI UK Rapid Response Event: Unwired Planet v Huawei - 13 November at 6PM | Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
Recall notice: Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 1:45 am
The written description requirement has been interpreted as requiring demonstration in the specification that the patent applicant "has invented species sufficient to support a claim to the functionally-defined genus" (Ariad v Eli Lilly). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am
With a focus on common law jurisdictions, the author considers issues in cases of online IP disputes, including the Actavis v Lilly case, a textbook case in private international law textbooks.Irene Calboli then discusses in Chapter 3 the classic research method of IP scholars – comparative legal analysis. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
Thierry Calame (Lenz & Staehelin), the Committee's Co-Chair, lead the panel session with an expert panel including Judge Meier-Beck (Presiding Judge of the German Federal Court of Justice), Larry Welch (Eli Lilly), Tina Chappell (Intel) and Michael Frohlich. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
So this moggy is enormously grateful to his EIP colleague Matthew Jones, for preparing a report of this case, which came out at the same time as the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 744 F.2d 213, 216 (1st Cir. 1984), more appropriate. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
Samsung, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 113 F.3d 1426, 1429 (6th Cir. 1997) (“A federal court in a diversity case is not free to engraft onto ... state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits”) (quoting Day & Zimmermann, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
Still Rose discusses two judgments relating to Genentech's EP (UK) patent for an anti-IL-17 antibody and its use in the treatment of psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), relating, the first to the validity of the patent, the second, to the validity of a Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) sought by Genentech based on the patent and Lilly's market authorization for Taltz. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
This one was filed by PhRMA, and this one was filed by something called the Medical Information Working Group, which is a consortium consisting of Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer, Lilly, Genentech, GSK, J&J, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
