Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 2701 - 2720 of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2011, 9:52 am by Michael H. Cohen
According to PR Newswire, the hospital could face penalties over $20 million dollars: In a 69-page opinion issued November 10, 2010, Judge Maurice B. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:45 am by Bystander
This doesn't always work out, so a bench may have to sort things out later. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:47 am
Gonzales approved the legal memorandum on "combined effects" over the objections of James B. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 4:14 am by Mack Sperling
Read this if you litigate with the North Carolina Department of Revenue over tax matters, or know someone who does. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Cette gamme ne figurant pas dans la demande P, la revendication 1 de la demande EP1 ne peut bénéficier que de la date de dépôt de EP1. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 7:23 am by John Holtz
4 C.F.R. 21.2(b) states that, for GAO protests, GAO has the option to dismiss or not dismiss a protest that is filed late if there is good cause or it is an important issue. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:22 am by Jamie Spencer
And even though she didn’t know about it, she apologized. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
But that is of no matter if the AEDPA language "second or successive petition" in 2244(b) merely incoporporated pre-AEDPA case law. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:08 am by Francis Pileggi
The plaintiffs in this case claim to satisfy Rule 23(b)(1)(B) because “[t]he prosecution of separate actions by or against individual members of the class would create a risk of . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm
” And within this entire matter, she was completely innocent – she wasn’t even present at the scene of the crime. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:27 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
 EP 2 753 168) for the sole reason that the claimed subject-matter falls within the exception to patentability according to Article 53(b) and Rule 28(2) EPC (here: plants exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process). [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:21 pm by Andrew Delaney
So, SCOV finds that (a) the Environmental Division had jurisdiction to hear this appeal, and (b) that the District Commission didn’t have the authority to issue the second notice. [read post]