Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 2701 - 2720 of 5,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am by Eric Goldman
” Bleeping’s Advisors are touted as experts who “can be trusted to give correct and understandable answers to [Bleeping’s] member’s [sic] questions. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 10:59 pm by JP Sarmiento
The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Matter of M-J-K-, 26 I&N Dec. 773 (BIA 2016): In another case displaying the Board’s focus on mental health issues in immigration court, the Board stated that an immigration judge has the discretion to determine the appropriate safeguards in a case under of Matter of M-A-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 474 (BIA 2011). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Matter of M-J-K-, 26 I&N Dec. 773 (BIA 2016): In another case displaying the Board’s focus on mental health issues in immigration court, the Board stated that an immigration judge has the discretion to determine the appropriate safeguards in a case under of Matter of M-A-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 474 (BIA 2011). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Eugene Volokh
In late 2009, … [t]he compliance supervisor at the [D]epartment, Rodney Griess, … reviewed a television commercial in which Bennie rode a horse and said he would give customers who did business with him “a hundred dollars towards the purchase of a firearm. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  See also Action Temp, 870 F.2d at 1566 n.9 (citing Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:36 pm by JP Sarmiento
The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
(d) Subsection (b)(1) of this section does not apply to a peaceable activity intended to express a political view or provide information to others. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:39 am
Thus, Applicant did not fail to comply with any substantive requirement as a matter of law. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For example, I did not know that the French word for ghostwriters is “nègres,” which is amazing. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
The Federal Court of Appeal has not squarely addressed the discrete disclosure issue since the SCC arguably “reinvigorated” the debate in Pfizer v Novopharm (“Viagra SCC”)[3], but may address the matter over the next year in Idenix’s pending appeal regarding the hepatitis drug sofosbuvir.[4] There appear to be some inconsistencies in recent FCA decisions. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:48 am
MacArthur, supra.The Superior Court then began its analysis of MacArthur’s arguments on appeal, explaining, initially, that hisfirst two claims concern the matter of Officer Lucas' amendment of the citation to reflect his own badge number. [read post]