Search for: "P. T.2" Results 2701 - 2720 of 14,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2011, 3:07 am
I – A penalidade administrativa de suspensão do direito de licitar, por até 2 (dois) anos, com a Administração, prevista no art. 87, III, da Lei nº. 8.666/93, surte seus efeitos com relação a todos os órgãos da Administração Pública, e não tão somente com relação ao ente que aplicou a sanção. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
After the Council of Ephesus in 431, the Orthodox Byzantine Empire (p = 1, both divine and human) persecuted the Nestorians of Antioch (p = 2, one divine and one human). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm by Thomas D. Nevins
Monfort of Colorado, Inc., 479 U.S.104, 116 (1986) (“[I]t is in the interest of competition to permit dominant firms to engage in vigorous competition, including price competition. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 10:45 am by Jon L. Gelman
The benefits will include: temporary disability, medical benefits and permanent disability/dependency benefits.The New Jersey law, Thomas P. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eric Goldman's post Blogger Isn’t Liable for Anonymous Comments–Griffith v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:40 am
" [So is the "F" word (no, not "fraud") in common usage, and who would say that the "F" word isn't vulgar? [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
[t]heconcept will continue to evolve and may change until it iscompletely finalized. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
"[T]he federal discovery rules place a duty on a party to turn over not only proper materials of which he is aware, but also those of which he reasonably ought to have been aware." [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You can say either universities shouldn’t be able to do this or that there should be a limit for this type of claim, but you need to say something. (2) It’s not persuasive to say that the ROP is better because it doesn’t engage in balancing with innovation policy. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
J 24/97 [2.2] and T 1026/06 [4], and the references cited therein.[6] The Board is of the opinion that this date is September 20, 2011, i.e. the day on which the professional representative signed the acknowledgement of receipt. [read post]