Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 5,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
The recent case of Cameron Moon v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
The recent case of Cameron Moon v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
The recent case of Cameron Moon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
Harris Cnty., 529 U.S. 576, 587, 120 S.Ct. 1655, 146 L.Ed.2d 621 (2000) (quoting Skidmore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:13 am
" Pickering v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 2:32 pm
In New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
United States of America, which vacated a U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
United States, a major Fourth Amendment case. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:11 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
Pursuant to that statute, "[a] sworn juror must be discharged when facts come to light, which were not known at the time the jury was empaneled, indicating that the juror is 'grossly unqualified to serve'" (People v Harris, 99 NY2d 202, 212 [2002], quoting CPL 270.35 [1]). [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Harris, No. 14-cv-00802, 2014 WL 4207599, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378 (2007). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Tuesday's Supreme Court ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
