Search for: "State v. Race" Results 2701 - 2720 of 8,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This includes “‘intentionally targeting a particular race’s access to [voting in elections] because its members vote for a particular party, in a predictable manner.'” The court traced modern attempts by the state’s GOP-controlled legislature to pass restrictive voter ID laws to a long history of racial discrimination within North Carolina, including North Carolina’s “race-based voter suppression” and the… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:28 am by Tom Smith
Higher education admissions preferences were upheld under the “diverse student body” rationale in the 1978 case Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
"The Ninth Circuit agrees with the district court that these statistics and underlying data state a valid Fair Housing Act claim. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bartlett v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Employers have been sued for alleged defamation of an employee founded on postings made on the employer's web site as the decision in Firth v State of New York, 98 NY2d 365, demonstrates. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Thomas v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist. 2024 NY Slip Op 03759 Decided on July 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Thomas v Garden City Park Water/Fire Dist. 2024 NY Slip Op 03759 Decided on July 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Deirdre could choose not to invite Peter based on his race, even though race-based exclusions by government are unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]