Search for: "State v. Vanness" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
, 2010 WL 4870149, at *7 (quoting State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. [read post]
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), and Mathijs A. van Dijk (Erasmus University), on Tuesday, June 18, 2019 Tags: Capital markets, Equity capital, International governance, IPOs, Liquidity, Market conditions, Market timing U.S. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am by Rick Garnett
The best-known instance and illustration of Justice Breyer's church-state intuitions is his concurring opinion in Van Orden v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:27 pm by David Klein
” Even though the Supreme Court had already issued its opinion in Facebook v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 1:00 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Stevie Martin, Strasbourg Observers: Dániel Karsai v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
In political, scientific, and artistic history, consider any biography or history describing Cleopatra, Mark Antony, Hannibal, Vincent van Gogh, Alan Turing, Ernest Hemingway, Ma­ri­lyn Monroe, or Kurt Cobain. [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
All records on the Device described in Attachment A that reference or relate to violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 175 . . . and involve DANIEL HARRY MILZMAN, including: a. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:12 am by Florian Mueller
The most important smartphone IP ruling in the months ahead is going to be the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Oracle v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Van Dellen,[11] a California Federal District Court again ruled that officers are not protected by the business judgment rule both because the codification of the rule in California Corporations Code Section 309 only refers to directors and be [read post]