Search for: "Town v. State"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 5,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip and Smithtown v New York State Div. of Human Rights Appeal Board, 35 NY2d 371, 380, motion to reargue denied, 36 NY2d 807, it was held that an aggrieved individual must file a timely notice of claim "as to the former but not as to the latter. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:00 am
Applying the Pell Doctrine in a disciplinary actionSullivan v County of Rockland, 2017 NY Slip Op 03519, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDisciplinary penalties imposed on public employees in New York State must meet the test set out in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Stevens v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Stevens v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 1:56 pm
Brown could be facing charges in a number of countries; it remains to be seen, however, what future actions will be taken.[1] Susan Watts, Stem Cell Treatment Warning, BBC, Aug. 30, 2006.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] See United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:05 pm
Parker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
Board of Education of Deer Park Union Free School District, 230 A.D.2d 820, a case involving a claim of lost retirement benefits] and those involving an individual seeking to vindicate a public interest (see, for example, Union Free School District No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Division of Human Rights Appeal Board, 35 NY2d 371, at 380, motion to reargue denied 36 NY2d 807).The general rule: statutes requiring the filing of a notice of claim… [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:14 pm
Town of Mt. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 6:26 am
Sandstone Creek Solar, LLC and Gary Walters v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 pm
Hardin v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:12 pm
Pluhar v Town of Southhampton, 29 AD3d 975 (2d Dept. 2006); Ciccone v Bedford Cent. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:17 pm
Town of Gilbert, 135 S. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:46 am
The Chestnut Ridge Action The Chestnut Ridge Action was filed after the Town of Ramapo issued a negative declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) for development plans prepared by a predecessor to a Wesley Hills plaintiff, which included a religious school, community center, and 60 units of multi-family housing. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Registration for the 26th Annual Family Law Institute began at 7:30 at the Sandestin Beach Hilton and I greeted many of my colleagues from Atlanta and others from throughout the State of Georgia. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Matter of Confreda v New York State Comptroller7. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Levitt-Ansca Towne Park P’ship v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Town of Mocksville v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
