Search for: "**u.s. v. Brown" Results 2721 - 2740 of 5,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Stengel, on the right of patients to sue in state court over failure to warn of side-effects of medical devices; 12-1497, Kellogg Brown & Root v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
The judges took turns testing this theory, Judge Kavanaugh by noting the Supreme Court’s seemingly equation, in Justice Kennedy’s Hamdan I concurrence and other places, of the law of war with international law; Judge Janice Rogers Brown, by asking whether the government meant to rest on a purely “domestic common law of war” theory, or the theory that U.S. practice serves to delimit inexact boundaries in international law; and Judge David Tatel, by wondering… [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm by Steve Vladeck
Circuit (minus Judge Srinivasan) will confront in tomorrow’s oral argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit will hear oral arguments in the case Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), the Supreme Court considered a statute that generally prohibited the picketing of residences, but exempted labor picketing. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:42 pm by Bankruptcy Attorney
Brown, 391 U.S. 471 (1968).It is important to timely file estate tax returns or comply with procedure to excuse the filing requirement (the opinion has a good review of certain new procedures). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:46 pm by Schachtman
  (See Multiplicity versus Duplicity – The Harkonen Conviction; The Matrixx Motion in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:58 am by Jeanine Cali
Her book, “The Lost Promise of Civil Rights” (Harvard University Press, 2007), explores varying understandings of civil rights in the era before “Brown v. [read post]