Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 2721 - 2740 of 10,147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2024, 5:52 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Sawyer, versus the unilateralist vision of the president as “the sole organ of our Nation in foreign affairs” trumpeted by Justice George Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:42 am by Old Fox
 Looking Backward describes the future United States as a regimented worker’s paradise where everyone has equal incomes, and men are drafted into the country’s “industrial army” at the age of 21, serving in the jobs assigned them by the state. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
United States when reading laws about computers. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:52 pm by National Indian Law Library
* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: John v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am by Mark Graber
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:53 pm
" - Winston Churchill (United States Constitution, Bill of Rights) © 2006-2009 Sex Offender Issues , All Rights Reserved [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:59 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The CFPB has filed an amicus brief in Billings v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Army Corps of Engineers, a case in which five states had asked the Court to order the installation of barriers to prevent Asian carp from entering the Great Lakes; Bob Drummond of Bloomberg, Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire, James Vicini of Reuters, AFP (via Google News), the Associated Press, and Bill Mears of CNN all have coverage, while Trevor Quirk discusses the threat posed by Asian carp in the Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]