Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 2721 - 2740
of 56,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2011, 5:46 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(C) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:47 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(C) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:38 pm
Under Federal Rule of Evidence 201(c), "A court may take judicial notice, whether requested or not. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(C) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 6:21 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 806 provides that When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Rule 801(d)(2)(C), (D), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked may be supported,... [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:36 am
Like its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 801(c) defines hearsay as a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:45 am
We are delighted to welcome the latest in our series of expert guest posts on A, B and C v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 12:31 am
Unfortunately, though, the court overlooked two other directly relevant 230(c)(2) opinions: * the Zango v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
This morning the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued an important zoning decision, Connors v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:46 pm
The Court had the opportunity to give a ruling on the extent of legal professional privilege (see judgement in Case C-155/79 AM&S Europe v Commission), holding that it is subject to two cumulative conditions. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:37 am
More specific to 230(c)(2), the court doesn't explore either Pallorium v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:24 pm
(The quote is not from the opinion but from the actual statute 512(c)(1)(A)(ii).) [read post]
28 May 2018, 2:17 pm
C. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:06 am
A mutant ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzyme according to claim 6 wherein: a) the residue at position 47 has an amino acid substation selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, F, G, I, L, N, P, H, T, E and Y; b) the residue at position 50 has an amino acid substitution selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, E, F, G, M, N, V, W and I; c) the residue at position 52 has an amino acid substitution selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, G,… [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:14 pm
The petition of the day is: Elonis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 3:45 pm
Carhart (05-380) and Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:52 pm
JOHN C. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm
Please note: The Judge Ben C. [read post]
