Search for: "English v. English" Results 2721 - 2740 of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
In particular, English courts generally conduct a far more restrictive review of foreign law as compared to English law. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters
In particular, English courts generally conduct a far more restrictive review of foreign law as compared to English law. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Newton (which stands for the proposition that hyperlinking does not constitute publication of the hyperlinked material), as well as the line of English cases considering ISP liability (Godfrey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm by Afro Leo
  This aspect was dealt with again on appeal by the English and Wales Court of Appeal in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as The London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limitedand (2) Ecotive Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1729). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
 Alice v CLS Bank ... could give rise to a restriction on grant and enforcement of business method patents. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am by INFORRM
The case of Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing ([2016] EWHC 66 (QB)) was a defamation claim in respect of an article in a Portuguese newspaper which alleged illegality on the part of a banker. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 6:58 am by Rose Hughes
The recent decision of the English High Court in Bayer v Teva [2021] EWHC 2690 (Pat) is another example in which the UK courts have found a pharmaceutical invention to be the obvious outcome of routine drug development. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am by Saskia Hayes, CMS
This gives effect to the most basic principle of natural justice which has been the foundation of the English legal system for centuries. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
The majority in Khuja held that this statement was confined to describing the basis on which English law permits the pre-trial identification of persons charged with offences. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:39 am by Alessandro Cerri
Applying Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834, the Court noted that what was important was the purpose for which the services were provided. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:33 am
Updating yesterday's ILB entry on the oral arguments set to be heard before the Indiana Supreme Court this Thursday in the case of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 5:33 am by Malcolm Hartwell
Lorcom Thirteen (Pty) Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company South Africa Ltd (54/08) [2013] ZAWCHC 64; 2013 (5) SA 42 (WCC); [2013] 4 All SA 71 (WCC) (29 April 2013) [read post]