Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Lawrence Ebner wonders, “given the unusual alignment of Justices” in Ramos v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
Lange v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
The Supreme Court has not given us much help in resolving similar issues in the future.The decision was very different in tone to Warner Lambert and Lilly v Actavis. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:25 am
Cabinet for Health and Family Services v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:05 pm
In Sharma v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:13 am
U.S. v., Gerritsen, No. 06-50552 (7-10-09). [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
Myers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership, which examines whether the invalidity defense of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
The offense is complete at the time the notice is given when it often cannot be known whether any interception will take place. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
The appeal was dismissed in full, with judgment given on 21 March 2018. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:12 am
Padden v Bevan Ashford (a firm); [2011] EWCA Civ 1616; [2011] WLR (D) 393 “A solicitor who certified in a mortgage that a client had been given appropriate legal advice about the mortgage and, to the best of his knowledge, had understood the effect of the mortgage and was not acting under undue influence or a misrepresentation, was under an obligation to have advised that client or to have taken steps to satisfy himself that she had been properly… [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:45 am
Misdemeanor v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
The district court said no, but the Court of Appeals says maybe.The case is Paganas v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Refusing to answer work-related questions in the course of an investigation 2015 NY Slip Op 01573, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals in Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154, cert denied 486 US 1007. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ritz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 10:17 am
Creative Impact Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In the case of Celli v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And on this basis, you can understand it as of a piece with the other anti-war play, Henry V--just Henry V carried remorselessly to its logical conclusion.The Ashland Henry V is not exactly a top-of-the-chart presentation: good enough, but you could wish for better. [read post]
