Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2016, 6:23 am
The case of Estate of Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
With respect to outstanding medical bills the court does not simply make a wife liable for her husband’s medical debt and vice versa. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:37 am
Fairbanks v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:36 pm
In response, the wife filed a cross-motion asking the trial court to deny her former husband’s request. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:47 am
Standard of Living Wife in Sunshine claimed that the trial court undervalued her and Husband’s standard of living during the marriage. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
In the case, Trost v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
In the Complaint, it was alleged that the Plaintiff's decedent, who had died in the accident, and the girlfriend had lived together prior to the accident and considered themselves to be common-law husband and wife. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
A husband and wife purchased a home in which the mortgage holder carried the property insurance policy in the name of the mortgage company. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:07 pm
In Battelle Memorial Institute v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:05 pm
Shortly after this Statute’s enactment, our state’s Supreme Court in Painter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Faced with the Husband's arrears of child support of $67,588, the Husband's portion of the marital residence minus those arrears is hereby awarded to the Wife as an equitable distribution in kind award of $118,912. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:28 pm
At that hearing, the wife was offered a continuance to obtain counsel, but the husband’s request for a continuance was denied. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:01 pm
All can be heard in New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew Cooper’s May 18, 2020 decision in Chu v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:26 pm
In Wilson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:29 pm
Gannon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:38 pm
Plaintiff-husband is a neurologist, and counsel claimed that his client's ability to care for his patients is severely impaired by his wife's conduct. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 12:00 am
D. 2001), the wife maintained that the trial court erred in the amount of child support it ordered because the husband failed to include private school for the parties’ daughter. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 2:09 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the trial court decision which applied the Bauer standard, reasoning that if the Wife had perpetrated a fraud on the Husband by allowing the Wife primary physical custody of the children and agreeing to the Bauer standard while the Wife knew that she was moving, then the Bauer standard had to be supplanted by a more stringent “best interest of the child” standard. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:46 pm
The October 7, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in Moore v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
In Chichak v. [read post]
