Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2721 - 2740 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
 Lord Chancellor Eldon said, in Beer v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Campbell v MGN The facts of Campbell are well known. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Graham Smith
"  Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Melina Padron
Burnley Training College Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2928 (Admin) (24 August 2011) November 9, 2011 Admin Court: Refusal of licence for Burnley college under Home Secretary’s policy to prevent abuse by overseas students was unlawful. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by GuestPost
” And as Lord Bingham went on to note in R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, the essence of breach of the peace in Howell “was to be found in violence or threatened violence”. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm by Schachtman
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
 The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v  Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
 Last month a three-judge panel consisting of Lords Neuberger, Reed and Carnwath refused leave to appeal, stating: "Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal". [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
Optical Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-897 (ITC July 30, 2014, Order) (Lord, ALJ). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
  Managing Intellectual Property had a bit of a scoop this week, picking up very quickly on the news that Lord Younger of Leckie, the current Minister for Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom, announced that his government had no plans to introduce an IP Tsar along the lines of the apparently successful Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm by Aparajita Lath
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
 Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. [read post]