Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
They're not very good at policing their own, Mark Bennett's on-point blog screeds notwithstanding. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
Mark your calendars for Thursday, February 12, 2009. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
”The Court states (para. 18) that-- “Read in isolation, that sentence could be interpreted as meaning that the licensee cannot, if the licence has not been entered in the Register, rely on the rights conferred by that licence vis-à-vis third parties, including the party infringing the trade mark. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Earlier coverage of Maples v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
Group v Empire State Dev. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
Counting to 5 (podcast) features “the second part of a two part look at the Court’s unanimous June 19th decision in Matal v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In a nutshell, the Court held that DOMA was invalid because it marked a stark deviation from a long history and tradition of the federal government’s deferring to state-law determinations of marital status. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm
" This reasoning is faulty and is also against settled Indian precedents and the international position.On another related note, administration of justice in the State of Tamil Nadu has not been upto the mark. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:23 am
See Lucas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Vancouver Community College v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
’” Bd. of Trs. of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:50 am
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
