Search for: "May v. State" Results 2721 - 2740 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2008, 2:18 pm
Even though a suit may be initiated in state court, if the federal subject matter jurisdiction requirements have been met, then the defendant may remove that case from state court to federal court. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:48 am by The Federalist Society
There are three questions now before the Supreme Court: (1) whether a formalist or functionalist analysis governs the extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States; (2) whether qualified immunity may be granted or denied based on facts – such as the victim’s legal status – unknown to the… [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether, in light of this Court’s prior precedents, particularly State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:37 am by Kraft Davies, PLLC
  Common law spouses may recover, if, looking to applicable state law, the existence of common law marriage is recognized. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The State therefore must be able to articulate some sensible basis for distinguishing what may come in from what must stay out. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 9:36 am by Elliott Michaud | JURIST Staff, US
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled Thursday in the case Central Unitaria de Traballadores/as v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
I have been asked before whether a UCL "unlawful" prong claim may be predicated on the defendant's violation of the law of another state. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Gregory Forman
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am by Barbara Shreero
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
In its decision Wednesday in Kansas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:55 am by WIMS
The issue in this appeal concerns when a voluntary state conservation agreement may be considered in deciding whether or not to list a species under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
Subsequently, these questions may be answered in due course of Max Mosley v UK.For further analysis on the potential of Max Mosley v UK, see Roy Greenslade’s Guardian blog titled “Why Max Mosley is right - and wrong”Sources: BBC News, out-law.com, usatoday, steeleslaw.co.uk, GuardianPhoto: makeroadssafe [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
Maine Supreme CourtMAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of DecisionsDecision: 2007 ME 139Docket: Ken-06-757Argued: May 23, 2007Decided: September 25, 2007JOHN DOE v. [read post]