Search for: "Miller, Appeal of"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 4,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The answer is that the Court of Appeals never established such a rule. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 11:30 am
Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3914.5 & nn.1.50 & 2 (2d ed.). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The answer is that the Court of Appeals never established such a rule. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Miller, a 15-page opinion, Judge Najam concludes:Mary was individually liable on the Line of Credit, and, as such, that debt was hers to pay. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
Hawkins, No. 175 In consolidated but otherwise unrelated criminal appeals, both convictions are affirmed where defendants did not properly preserve for appellate their challenges to the legal sufficiency of the evidence. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:35 pm
What if the government now appeals the sentence? [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:46 pm
What if the government now appeals the sentence? [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Miller-Jenkins, 06-672. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
Miller’s answer was, essentially, “no. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:46 am
Both in the opposition and the previous government, the Jamaica Labour Party expressed its preference for establishing a national court of final appeal. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 11:17 am
In Miller v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:35 pm
In a published opinion filed on August 17, 2020, the Third District Court of Appeal mostly affirmed the trial court’s judgment upholding Placer County’s partial abandonment of public easement rights in an emergency access/public transit road connecting two Lake Tahoe-area residential subdivisions; the County took the action to resolve disputes that had arisen after one subdivision’s residents began using the road as an all-purpose public road and short-cut through the… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm
In a published opinion filed December 17, 2018, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment granting a writ setting aside El Dorado County’s approval of, and related Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for, construction of a Dollar General Store in the “quaint” downtown area of unincorporated Georgetown, a Gold Rush-era “hamlet” designated as a State Historical Landmark. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
The Court of Appeal’s opinion in this regard appears to overlook key legal issues. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Application Of The “Fair Argument” Test The Court of Appeal observed that CEQA provides no “ironclad definition” of what constitutes a significant effect and that “[i]f there is disagreement among expert opinion supported by facts …. the Lead Agency shall treat the effect as significant and shall prepare an EIR” (citing 14 Cal. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:14 am
Captain Miller for the defense on 066. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:54 am
The Court of Appeals therefore sent the case back down to the district court for further proceedings. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Artuz, 1995 Westlaw 634995, and Miller v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 4:07 am
Miller-Young rationalized that since she was right, silencing the opposition was justified. [read post]
