Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2025, 6:05 am
Under Accardi v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Yet he emphasizes that "we don't always line up 6-3, 5-4, the way some people tend to think. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm
See City of Columbia v Costle, 710 F2d 1009, 1013 (CA 4, 1983). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
As evidence of this trend, consider the Court’s decision in American Legion v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
., the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and at least five other people, including a lawyer connected to the Russian government who promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
But the overwhelming number of American state constitutions has rejected any such understanding of “the executive branch,” none more so than my home state of Texas, in which the governor appoints only the Secretary of State even as “we the people” cast separate ballots for, among many other offices, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Land Commissioner, and members of the State Board of Education. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 11:09 am
Westacre Investments v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:57 am
It may well determine whether the new Trump administration will be permitted to bend people to do its bidding by resort to the most coercive of bludgeons, a criminal indictment. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The point of the gimmicks is to give executive branch officials and, in the event of litigation, judges, a fig leaf of legal authority to avert economic disaster. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
There were, to be sure, some gadflies, such as Richard Epstein at the University of Chicago who denounced the New Deal in root and branch, as well as Gary Lawson and Randy Barnett, all of whom conveyed a distinctly libertarian sensibility. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
The object of the annual letter is to provide guidance for the nation and its people. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
There is no reason in principle that these overlapping and intersecting concerns will align in a way that gets the right people in school, trains them in the first (and reasonable cost) ways, and puts them to work helping people and communities in need. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
People must also be able to find and effectively use these sites to build legal capacity, Hagan writes. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
It is an extraordinary power grab by the judicial branch, showing disrespect to two coequal branches: Congress, which saw it fit to authorize an expert agency to review these decisions; and the Executive Branch, which uses a U.S. [read post]
