Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
Song by Peter and Gordon. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
Peter B. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
Stewart v Seward (2007) 148 CA4th 1513. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 pm
With specialist chapters written by leading academic and practising lawyers, including Peter Oliver himself, this edition has been extensively rewritten to take into account recent judgments from the ECJ, including important cases such as C-110/05 Commission v Italy ("trailers") and C- 142/05 Mickelsson ("jet skis") [oh dear, the Kat didn't spot this one when it was decided, but it does mention the free movement of goods ... just], both of which… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
Via the cheerfully enthusiastic Open Rights Group campaigner Peter Bradwell comes news that ORGZine has commenced a series of short, punchy pieces on what the UK Government should do with Digital Opportunity, the recent report of the Hargreaves Review. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:16 am
: "Inside Google+ — How the Search Giant Plans to Go Social" http://j.mp/l6VBe7 The Peter Black Daily is out! [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
ERRICO, JR., Honorable Peter E. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Felicty Gerry for Halsbury’s Law Exchange said that as a barrister, she does not want to Vajazzle, but just to see a fair trial. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Sherman et. al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:31 am
The complaint does not explicitly restrict its class to those investors that purchased their shares on the NYSE, but the question undoubtedly will arise under Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
Hat Tip: Peter Lattman (N.Y. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
Peter Rost. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:51 pm
Third Circuit Court of Appeals written opinion issued in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:56 pm
But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:02 pm
Peter W. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
REGENCY Co-Op, Inc., BER-C-167-10, Peter E. [read post]
