Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 178,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 9:09 am
What’s worse, such testosterone therapy drugs may put men at increased risk for heart attacks and strokes, according to the Food and Drug Administration and a flurry of federal lawsuits. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 10:01 pm
Yarbrough denied the plaintiff’s Motion For Sanctions For Spoliation Of Audio Recording Evidence, after a jury trial in favor of the plaintiff, finding that there was minimal prejudice to the plaintiff and that “there is no dispute over the relevant contents of the telephone conversation” which was recorded. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 11:26 am
September 24, 2021), the Court (1) denied Plaintiff Apex Clearing Corporation’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of defendants’ experts Mumford and Distler; (2) denied Plaintiff Axos Bank’s motion for summary judgment on four counts of trademark infringement; (3) denied defendants/counter-plaintiffs Axos Financial, Inc. and Axos Clearing LLC’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement; and (4) granted-in-part… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am
In a post-trial decision, the lower court threw out the plaintiff 50% LLC member’s claims for fraud and unjust enrichment. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:41 am
” Let’s make it a trifecta. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:03 am
One of the plaintiff’s major arguments on appeal was that the trial court erred by allowing evidence of a repair invoice. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
Consumer protection Preemption BOTTOM LINE: District court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s state-based tort and fraud claims against manufacturers of bottled water, infant formula, and baby food consumed by plaintiff’s minor daughter was proper because federal law, which provides uniform labeling standards for bottled water, preempted plaintiff’s state-based bottled water claims, and, as to… [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:16 am
Two of the lead plaintiffs in the BAR/BRI class action litigation are not at all pleased with their firm's proposed settlement of the lawsuit. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 11:24 am
John’s University [...] [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 12:59 pm
Thus, his affirmation was sufficient to meet the plaintiff’s burden of proof. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
The plaintiff cross motions were denied as the plaintiff’s arguments about the insufficiency of the responses were without merit it. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:35 am
Furthermore, one tortfeasor’s payment cannot be used to offset the under insurance gap of the other tortfeasor. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:35 am
Furthermore, one tortfeasor’s payment cannot be used to offset the under insurance gap of the other tortfeasor. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:35 am
Furthermore, one tortfeasor’s payment cannot be used to offset the under insurance gap of the other tortfeasor. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
Rule 15’s more lenient standard was replaced by the stringent standards of Rules 59 and 60, and the trial court denied plaintiff’s motion to amend.Plaintiff did appeal thisorder. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
The court, reciting the general law on point, claimed that when a plaintiff claims injury from a dangerous condition on a person’s land, liability depends on the defendant’s control of the instrumentality that causes harm. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:44 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently held that class action plaintiffs cannot stipulate to a voluntary dismissal with prejudice, then appeal the trial court’s prior interlocutory order striking their class allegations because a voluntary dismissal does not qualify as a “final decision” under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
Plaintiffs in Minneapolis and Saint Paul have filed a lawsuit against the state, alleging that the racial and poverty segregation in the metropolitan area violates the state constitution's education clause, equal protection clause, and due process clause, as well as the Minnesota Human Rights Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm
Plaintiff, seeking declarative and injunctive relief, brought a putative class action alleging that the city and county of San Francisco failed to comply with certain requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, specifically alleging that many of San Francisco’s public rights-of-way, pools, libraries, parks, and recreation facilities were not readily accessible to and usable by […] [read post]
23 May 2023, 10:59 am
Hoyt, a federal district judge in the Southern District of Texas, ordered FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. to pay a historic $366 million in damages, with 4.69% postjudgment interest, for violating Jennifer Harris’s rights under Section 1981 and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights […] The post Texas Jury Awards Plaintiff Alleging Racial Discrimination and Retaliation $366 Million in Damages appeared first on Katz Banks Kumin LLP. [read post]
