Search for: "Spells v. Spells"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
On Feb. 23, 2022, veteran defense lawyer and prosecutor Mark Pomerantz resigned from the Manhattan District Attorney Office where he had helped lead a criminal investigation over the past year into former president Donald Trump’s finances and business practices. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
True, the case that spelled the end of the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Last week, a Manhattan appellate panel in Antonini v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In Blumenthal v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 7:58 pm
FPTP is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution explicitly, or spelled out in any constitutional documents. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Jury - http://bit.ly/SParA8 (Dan Levine) Apple v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm
The Walker v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:36 am
Coryn Group II, LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
Tinkler v Ferguson The case of Tinkler -v- Ferguson [2018] EWHC 3563 (QB) concerned a claim by a director of Stobart Group Limited (“Stobart”), against five other members of Stobart’s board of directors of that company. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
The intervention spells out why online anonymity must be safeguarded [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
It doesn't discuss whether he spells the nation's doom or its triumph. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
He had some pretty strong words about the decision of his predecessor Sir James Munby in a case called A v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
The basis on which the Fifth Circuit decided potentially spells doom for a later-filed Continental v. [read post]
