Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 2721 - 2740 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 7:44 am by Howard Friedman
 The court found no state action.In Farfan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Counting to 5 (podcast) features “the second part of a two part look at the Court’s unanimous June 19th decision in Matal v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
Moreover, in my view, a different interpretation would be at odds with the unitary nature of the trade mark, for the proprietor of the earlier Community trade mark would be accorded differing protection in the various Member States, depending on whether the national law afforded him the possibility of instigating proceedings against an infringer without awaiting the cancellation of the later national trade mark adversely affecting his rights. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Vancouver Community College v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
| Can the god of wealth be registered as a trade mark, and why? [read post]