Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 2721 - 2740 of 6,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2016, 4:10 pm
In her decision in Wong v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Monday’s order list brought good news for the petitioners in two of last week’s relists (with correspondingly bad news for the people on the other side of the “v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  I’m not sure how many noncounterfeiting real logo copying cases there are, as opposed to things like stylized initials that probably don’t cross the © threshold. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Not clear that people often approach design in that way. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
When the defense counsel sought to obtain copies of those materials in order to cross-examine the search authority, the military judge stated that the Government had met its burden and that the commander's testimony was `overkill. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal created a process R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am by INFORRM
In his cross-examination, Mr Vines appeared to characterise the article as a retraction. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 10:16 am by John Floyd
It is not as uncommon as many people think – children do make false allegations of sexual abuse by adults. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Calvin Harris Injured in Car Accident, Shows Canceled, May 27, 2016, E Online, By Corinne Heller More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Calvin Harris Injured in Car Accident, Shows Canceled, May 27, 2016, E Online, By Corinne Heller More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm by Peter Groves
Without referring expressly to the 1977 Act, the judge did just that.The judgment should make it more difficult for people to remove murals from property they do not own - although in practical terms it is surely significant that Banksies, one removed from their original sites, seem to cross the Atlantic pretty quickly to be sold by auction beyond the effective reach of the English courts.As for copyright, Mr Justice Arnold also had no difficulty in recognising that Banksy owned it… [read post]