Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 2721 - 2740 of 7,223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am by Thomas Musmann
IIAs regularly define patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights (IP) as protected investments. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But, the very day that PLM filed the affidavits (which state, among other things, that there is “no proceeding involving said rights pending and not disposed of either in the United States Patent and Trademark Office or in a court”), there was a status conference on this case, in which there was a challenge to the registrability of the marks. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 5:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(Nasdaq: ACOR ) today [March 31] announced that the United States District Court for the District of Delaware upheld U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:43 pm by James Yang
Ricoh and Xerox filed an inter partes review which is a post grant proceeding held at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:43 pm by James Yang
Ricoh and Xerox filed an inter partes review which is a post grant proceeding held at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:44 am by Dennis Crouch
My proposal is to join the United States Copyright Office with the already existing United States Patent and Trademark Office to form a cross-doctrine United States Intellectual Property Office (USIPO). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:41 pm by Gene Quinn
According to credible sources, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has been interviewing perspective candidates for the position of Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am by Marc Whipple
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
This international application filed under the PCT [hereinafter referred to as "international application" or "subsequent application"], for which the EPO acted as designated Office, had been filed in the name of Tenaris Connections AG as applicant for all designated states except the United States of America and of five natural persons as applicants for the United States of America on 6 September 2003. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:37 am by Eric Caligiuri
., the United States Supreme Court held that laches cannot be invoked as a defense against a claim for patent infringement damages brought within U.S.C §286’s 6-year limitations period. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:36 am by Kayla A. Haines, Esq.
Perform a search of the name with the United States Patent & Trademark Office to make sure you are not infringing on someone else’s trademark. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by Gene Quinn
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued a decision in the CRISPR patent interference pending between The Broad Institute, Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:57 am by Gene Quinn
Lee, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), related to the petition for writ of certiorari filed by Oil States Energy Services, LLC, Petitioner, against Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et. al. [read post]
Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, and the agency most relevant to patent practitioners, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:52 am by Eric Quitugua
The workshops are hosted by the two UTRGV centers, the State Bar of Texas Intellectual Property Law Section, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:33 am by Dan Harris
And with complicated products comes complicated intellectual property issues involving trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:15 am by Josh H. Escovedo
I’ve written on numerous occasions in the past about celebrities who registered their own names as trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am by Melissa Barnett
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am by Melissa Barnett
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am by Melissa Barnett
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]